{"id":1305844,"date":"2025-10-14T10:28:06","date_gmt":"2025-10-14T07:28:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/three-fakes-about-poroshenko\/"},"modified":"2025-10-15T06:21:48","modified_gmt":"2025-10-15T03:21:48","slug":"three-fakes-about-poroshenko","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/three-fakes-about-poroshenko\/","title":{"rendered":"Three Lies That Built the Myth About Poroshenko"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Source: Author&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/DmytroVovnianko\/posts\/pfbid02aAqWLKfJoCgRaqvZ9tc2pHzdtYXqYUTG7qkEDh5W9wNSh5eg4zYkM44q8kkS7oF1l\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Facebook<\/a> page<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>If lies define your election campaign, you\u2019re already in trouble \u2014 because those lies can later be used to justify sanctions. That\u2019s exactly what happened to Ukraine\u2019s fifth president, Petro Poroshenko.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"0\" data-end=\"196\">Journalists have obtained the documents on which the sanctions against Petro Poroshenko were based. And it turns out that those sanctions rested on just three small \u2014 but very deliberate \u2014 lies.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"198\" data-end=\"371\">The first lie: that Petro Poroshenko was a co-founder of the <strong data-start=\"259\" data-end=\"279\">Party of Regions<\/strong>. Even Mykola Azarov has publicly denied this. Yet Poroshenko\u2019s opponents won\u2019t let it go.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"373\" data-end=\"556\">Here\u2019s what actually happened. In 2000, Poroshenko\u2019s party <strong data-start=\"432\" data-end=\"446\">Solidarity<\/strong> was part of an interparty association called the <em data-start=\"496\" data-end=\"554\">Party of Regional Revival \u201cLabor Solidarity of Ukraine.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"558\" data-end=\"779\">However, <strong data-start=\"567\" data-end=\"601\">Solidarity refused to dissolve<\/strong> itself and join the new single party that would later become the Party of Regions \u2014 which, at that time, had no sign of either Kolesnikov or Yanukovych (they came much later).<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"781\" data-end=\"944\" data-is-last-node=\"\" data-is-only-node=\"\">Just a few months later, <strong data-start=\"806\" data-end=\"829\">Solidarity withdrew<\/strong> from the association altogether, explicitly rejecting the idea of forming a joint party. That\u2019s it \u2014 end of story.<\/p>\n\t\t<aside class=\"shortcode-also\" data-title=\"Read also\" >\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/lawyer-novikov-in-the-supreme-court-the-public-has-seen-evidence-of-falsified-sanctions-against-poroshenko\/\">Lawyer Novikov in the Supreme Court: The public has seen evidence of falsified sanctions against Poroshenko.<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\n<p data-start=\"0\" data-end=\"532\">So, Poroshenko is being criticized for cooperating \u2014 twenty-five years ago \u2014 with what <em data-start=\"87\" data-end=\"94\">later<\/em> became the \u201cParty of Regions\u201d? Seriously? Then why not criticize Zelenskyy for entertaining Yanukovych and Medvedev in a sauna? Or ask how the \u201cServant of the People\u201d party is doing now \u2014 the same one that votes in sync with Boyko and Lyovochkin\u2019s faction in the Verkhovna Rada? Somehow, the fact that party leader Olena Shuliak calls former Regionals a <em data-start=\"449\" data-end=\"476\">\u201cconstructive opposition\u201d<\/em> doesn\u2019t seem to bother the zealous fans of ZE at all.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"534\" data-end=\"623\">Double standards have clearly become the corporate identity of <em data-start=\"597\" data-end=\"620\">Servant of the People<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"625\" data-end=\"823\">Now to the second lie \u2014 the <strong data-start=\"653\" data-end=\"666\">coal case<\/strong>. Poroshenko is accused of allegedly pressuring the government to buy coal from mines in the occupied territories. But let\u2019s start with a few simple facts.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"825\" data-end=\"1189\">For one, the law enforcement agencies have <em data-start=\"868\" data-end=\"883\">no complaints<\/em> about the Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman, whose government actually approved all those purchases. And second \u2014 and most importantly \u2014 the coal came from <strong data-start=\"1041\" data-end=\"1060\">Ukrainian mines<\/strong> legally registered in territories controlled by Ukraine, paying taxes into the Ukrainian budget and wages to Ukrainian miners.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1191\" data-end=\"1389\" data-is-last-node=\"\" data-is-only-node=\"\">It was an economic decision, not a political one. Ukraine had to survive the heating season and needed every available resource to fund its defense. The world is cruel \u2014 but reality is even more so.<\/p>\n\t\t<aside class=\"shortcode-also\" data-title=\"Read also\" data-right>\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/sanctions-against-poroshenko-were-based-on-old-accusations-the-media-cited-secret-documents-from-the-national-security-and-defense-council\/\">Sanctions against Poroshenko were based on \u201cold accusations\u201d: the media cited secret documents from the National Security and Defense Council<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\n<p data-start=\"0\" data-end=\"470\">What\u2019s that now? It looks bad, they say, to import coal from the occupied territories? And is it any better when the <em data-start=\"117\" data-end=\"124\">green<\/em> government buys <strong data-start=\"141\" data-end=\"217\">bitumen for its \u201cGreat Construction\u201d projects from the aggressor country<\/strong>? Or when it <strong data-start=\"230\" data-end=\"263\">purchases Russian electricity<\/strong> \u2014 yes, Russian \u2014 through Belarus?<br data-start=\"297\" data-end=\"300\" \/>Why, then, are there no sanctions against current government officials? Especially since, let\u2019s be clear, <strong data-start=\"406\" data-end=\"470\" data-is-only-node=\"\">there\u2019s still no court verdict in the so-called \u201ccoal case.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"320\" data-end=\"834\">The third lie \u2014 that Poroshenko was involved in the adoption of the <strong data-start=\"388\" data-end=\"410\">Kharkiv agreements<\/strong>. The facts are simple: the agreements were signed by Yanukovych and Medvedev and ratified by the Verkhovna Rada amid chaos \u2014 shouting, sirens, and flour thrown across the chamber \u2014 after Poroshenko had already resigned as foreign minister. As for the comments and assessments attributed to him back then\u2026 perhaps it\u2019s time to consider sanctions against the then-aide to MP Tadeev, a certain Andriy Yermak \u2014 don\u2019t you think?<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"836\" data-end=\"1113\" data-is-last-node=\"\" data-is-only-node=\"\">\n<p data-start=\"1005\" data-end=\"1296\">It seems the sanctions resolution against Poroshenko was written in haste \u2014 so sloppy they even managed to <strong data-start=\"1112\" data-end=\"1140\">get his tax number wrong<\/strong>. Most likely, they cobbled it together from talking points taken straight from <em data-start=\"1220\" data-end=\"1254\">pro-government Telegram channels<\/em>. The motive couldn\u2019t be more transparent.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1298\" data-end=\"1623\">Sanctions against Poroshenko were introduced on <strong data-start=\"1346\" data-end=\"1367\">February 12, 2025<\/strong>, at a moment when nearly everyone was talking about Washington allegedly pressuring Kyiv into a peace deal with Russia, which would soon lead to elections.<br data-start=\"1524\" data-end=\"1527\" \/>And, notably, <strong data-start=\"1541\" data-end=\"1623\">Zelenskyy\u2019s spat with Trump in the Oval Office happened just three days later.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1625\" data-end=\"1959\">It\u2019s hard to shake the impression that these sanctions were a political move \u2014 an attempt to <strong data-start=\"1718\" data-end=\"1770\">block Poroshenko from entering the election race<\/strong> using a fabricated pretext.<br data-start=\"1798\" data-end=\"1801\" \/>The <em data-start=\"1805\" data-end=\"1812\">green<\/em> Office of the President seems to have borrowed this trick directly from Moscow \u2014 the same tactic once used there against Boris Nemtsov\u2019s allies.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1961\" data-end=\"2192\" data-is-last-node=\"\" data-is-only-node=\"\">Now, it all appears headed toward an inevitable outcome: <strong data-start=\"2018\" data-end=\"2087\">Zelenskyy will be forced to lift the sanctions against Poroshenko<\/strong>. And when that happens, this entire deception will explode into a political disaster for his government.<\/p>\n<p>Also follow <strong>\u201cPryamyi\u201d<\/strong> on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pryamiy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Facebook<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/prm_ua\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Twitter<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/+rtV4dxYu2_cyNjVi\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Telegram<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/pryamiy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Instagram.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><em>\u2022 Materials published in the \u201cOPINIONS\u201d section reflect the opinion of the author of the publication, who bears full responsibility for the accuracy of the information.<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><em>\u2022 The editorial staff of prm.ua may not share the opinions expressed in the author&#8217;s material.<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><em>\u2022 The owner of the webpage in the \u201cOPINIONS\u201d section is the author of the publication.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: Author&#8217;s Facebook page If lies define your election campaign, you\u2019re already in trouble \u2014 because those lies can later be used to justify sanctions. That\u2019s exactly what happened to Ukraine\u2019s fifth president, Petro Poroshenko. Journalists have obtained the documents on which the sanctions against Petro Poroshenko were based. And it turns out that those [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":1306395,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[76871,76872,76893],"class_list":["post-1305844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-2","category-news-feed","category-thoughts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1305844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1305844"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1305844\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1306398,"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1305844\/revisions\/1306398"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1306395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1305844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1305844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}