{"id":1350781,"date":"2026-01-29T12:14:15","date_gmt":"2026-01-29T10:14:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/what-is-better-to-destroy-the-russian-or-his-logistics\/"},"modified":"2026-01-30T07:04:29","modified_gmt":"2026-01-30T05:04:29","slug":"what-is-better-to-destroy-the-russian-or-his-logistics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prm.ua\/en\/what-is-better-to-destroy-the-russian-or-his-logistics\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Killing Logistics Works Better Than Killing Soldiers"},"content":{"rendered":"

Source: Author’s Facebook<\/a> page<\/em><\/p>\n

Yigal Levin and Ryan O\u2019Leary argue that instead of accelerating the destruction of Russian infantry, the focus should shift to dismantling Russian logistics\u2014both along the front line and deep in the operational rear.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Strange statements.<\/p>\n

Targeting Russian logistics and equipment\u2014without striking the factories that produce and repair them\u2014amounts to hitting the leg, not the heart. It can only be regarded as a tactical move, not a strategy.<\/p>\n

Destroyed Russian soldiers, however, cannot be replaced. A soldier is not a piece of equipment but a unit that requires twenty years of \u201cproduction\u201d and the formation of social ties.<\/p>\n

Moreover, the destruction of hundreds of thousands\u2014or even a million\u2014Russian soldiers inevitably shapes future opponents of war among today\u2019s Russian children.<\/p>\n\t\t