Thoughts

The Hidden Dangers of the NABU Shake-Up

Thoughts
The Hidden Dangers of the NABU Shake-Up
In wartime, Ukraine critically depends on the support of its democratic allies. But in democracies, no aid decision is made in a vacuum — public sentiment matters. Politicians in allied capitals must weigh not only strategic interests but also the moods, concerns, and views of their citizens. This means every message from Ukraine — every image, every reform, every controversy — can shape the political will to continue supporting us.

The Russians know this, and they use it effectively. That is why Ukraine is often portrayed as a weak, corrupt country unworthy of German, British, or American taxpayer support.

Literally: “Don’t fund Ukraine — corrupt officials will steal your aid, and the French will only see their taxes spent on Maybachs with Ukrainian plates cruising the Côte d’Azur.”

In this environment, Ukraine must demonstrate — consistently and convincingly — that Russian propaganda lies. That there is justice in Ukraine. The courts defend fairness and protect investment. That law enforcement defends the rule of law. That officials serve the public interest with integrity.

Instead, we’ve chosen to show the opposite. The only — albeit symbolic — independent anti-corruption agency was publicly humiliated and turned into a regular “district office.” The government openly undermines NABU’s independence. An opposition leader is sanctioned simply for being in opposition. Television channels are shut down. Foreign investors complain of obstruction and pressure from the authorities.

The result: a crisis manufactured by the government itself, with no explanation — and with direct consequences for continued international aid. And when Russian Telegram channels push the message, “Why support Ukraine? Just look at what they did to NABU” — what counterargument will our strategic communications teams present?

NABU is not above criticism. Its performance, efficiency, and even ethical practices are all up for debate. One could argue that the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) is treating NABU in the same way NABU treats its suspects. Perhaps NABU is simply being hit by the same system it helped to build.

But choosing this course — at this moment — damages the country. It endangers vital support from democratic allies. That is not just short-sightedness. That is criminal irresponsibility.

This isn’t just the construction of a dictatorship. It’s the construction of a dictatorship that nobody in the democratic world wants anything to do with.

Also, follow “Pryamyi” on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, and Instagram.

• Materials published in the “THOUGHTS” section reflect the opinion of the author of the publication, who bears full responsibility for the accuracy of the information.
• The editors of prm.ua may not share the opinions expressed in the author’s material.
• The owner of the web page in the “THOUGHTS” section is the author of the publication.