Europe’s Drone Dilemma: Insurance or Illusion of Safety

Source: Author’s Facebook page

There is a simple idea with far-reaching consequences: if every EU country contributes just 0.25% of its GDP annually to defense support and joint arms production with Ukraine, the bloc would secure about €45 billion each year. This would not be “just another aid package,” but a genuine insurance policy for Europe’s own security.

I will give just a few arguments why this approach is strategically beneficial for the EU:

• Containment is cheaper than crisis management. Every euro spent on the frontline saves dozens at home — from energy shocks to the cost of insuring business risks.

• European defense autonomy. 0.25% translates into long-term contracts for air and missile defense, UAVs, ammunition, and repair hubs.

• Policy for years, not seasonal “packages.” A fixed contribution eliminates turbulence between governments and election cycles, ensuring stable security for the entire European region.

The prospect of a joint, integrated European air-defense system — a true “drone wall” — would guarantee protection of the skies over Warsaw, Vilnius, and Kyiv.

Mass weapons production should not be a stopgap response to individual crises, but a systematic supply of the entire defense sector: stockpiles, formation reserves, and rapid replenishment capabilities.

Industry vs economy — for Europe and Ukraine, this means jobs, tax revenue, and a faster, home-grown response to emerging threats.

I am convinced that 0.25% of GDP would be a boost to every European budget. Locking that contribution in for 3–5 years would deliver three concrete outcomes:

1. A reliable shield for the continent.

2. Strengthened national defense capabilities;

3. A robust defense industry.

Today, Ukraine is the outpost; tomorrow, every European will reap the benefits. Strengthening our shared ability to degrade the enemy is not charity — it is prudent self-defense.

Also, follow “Pryamyi” on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, and Instagram.

• Materials published in the “OPINIONS” section reflect the opinion of the author of the publication, who bears full responsibility for the accuracy of the information.
• The editorial staff of prm.ua may not share the opinions expressed in the author’s material.
• The owner of the webpage in the “OPINIONS” section is the author of the publication.