Questions on ‘Dynasty’ Go Unanswered as Critics Come Under Fire

Vova Petrov took a break from gardening on the “critically important” channel Korisne TV for the country and decided to throw it at Iryna Gerashchenko and me again. We stir him up; it happens.

But society today is concerned about something completely different—the Dynasty cooperative.

The scale of this construction is difficult to even assess without comparing it to the surrounding estates in Koncha Zaspa, where, as is known, nothing is small. And if we recall Goloborodko’s apartment in Troyeshchyna, the contrast is especially telling.

This is exactly what people want to hear answers about. Who are the owners? Why the silence? Why, instead of explanations, the usual telegram-line-shooter from Bankova?

But Vova Petrov, of course, will not write about this. Like most Telegram channels that work in conjunction with the Office of the President. There, there are traditionally no comments on such topics.

All this information garbage can only exist in their own environment of fakes, manipulation, and hatred, which they themselves have been building for years.

In any normal discussion, in an open dialogue, in a real competition of ideas, they are simply non-competitive.

It’s a pity only for Ukrainians, who for the seventh year in a row have been trying to sell this cheap informational “VovaPetroving” instead of real solutions, honest conversation, and results.

Because all this is as far from the promised “new quality of politics” as the Dynasty cooperative is from Holoborodko’s apartment in Troyeshchyna.

And while society has yet to hear who the owners are—Vova or Andriy—Bankova continues to pretend that the country’s main problem is other people’s posts on Facebook.

Also, follow “Pryamyi” on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, and Instagram.

• Materials published in the “OPINIONS” section reflect the opinion of the author of the publication, who bears full responsibility for the accuracy of the information.
• The editorial staff of prm.ua may not share the opinions expressed in the author’s material.
• The owner of the webpage in the “OPINIONS” section is the author of the publication.