Alaska Summit Concludes Without Concrete Outcomes
Фотоколаж О.Голобуцький
Source: Author’s Facebook page
The Alaska summit ended without concrete results. However, Trump’s refusal to attend the dinner suggests he was far from pleased with this “nothing,” seemingly expecting Putin to accept all or most of the proposals, especially after the American president had shown considerable goodwill by unfreezing diplomacy and agreeing to meet in person.
Rumors from “informed sources” circulating in Western media that Trump signaled to the Europeans that “peace will come quickly if Zelenskyy relinquishes Donbas, and then Putin will sign certain documents” scarcely reflect anyone’s—including Putin’s—actual plans. This represents merely one variant of Trump’s position: “I have done what I could; now resolve the matter yourselves.”
The same applies to the information reported by the Wall Street Journal, which claims that Trump indicated to Europe his readiness to provide security guarantees to Ukraine. Since no mechanisms exist to implement such guarantees (threats of imposing “the most severe sanctions” do not constitute guarantees) and as this would require both expenditure from the American budget and Trump’s involvement—an extensive and complex undertaking—Trump intends to avoid both in the future and to terminate this matter entirely.
The outcome of the meeting was most accurately summarized by CNN: “The EU believes that following the summit with Putin, Trump is inclined to consider that the Russian leader is not opposed to the idea of a trilateral meeting involving Zelenskyy.” In essence, the result consists of the assumptions of third parties regarding the assumptions and intentions of the other parties.
Although I see no reason for pessimism, primarily because the outcome could have been much worse. We could have been immediately forced to surrender our territories and state structure for nothing—a “letter of happiness from Putin”—since Putin did not even want to discuss a ceasefire before the talks began.
The game continues. Trump is, at minimum, irritated, and at most, furious: he “invested in diplomacy”—elevating Putin’s status from that of an outcast to a partner, agreeing to the red carpet (which only In met, and the world’s media took notice), deploying American fighters to secure the path for the dictator (even Republicans noticed and expressed indignation), and planning economic cooperation with potential benefits for Russia. Yet, Putin trampled all of this and even attempted to publicly blackmail Trump, reminding him, “You were elected on certain promises; uphold them,” highlighting his failure to deliver.
This does not mean that Trump will now side with Ukraine against Putin, but it may result in softer terms for Trump’s engagement with Europe regarding Ukraine.
Putin, of course, has managed to postpone substantive discussions until autumn, if not until spring 2026. However, this is likely a setback for him: from September onward, after the meeting with Xi, the fate of Russia and the war it initiated will no longer be determined solely by Putin and Trump, but by Trump and Xi. This, at the very least, will further bind Russia politically to the People’s Republic of China.
Recall that during a meeting with US President Donald Trump in Alaska, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin put forward many demands for ending the war against Ukraine. The Kremlin’s proposals exclude a ceasefire until a full peace agreement is reached.
One of the key demands is the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the entire territory of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. In return, Russia agrees to freeze the front line in Kherson and Zaporizhia regions and is even ready to return small areas in Sumy and Kharkiv regions.
Instead, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy once again rejected the idea of transferring the territory of Donbas to the Russians. The Ukrainian president’s position has not changed, as he emphasized before the meeting between Trump and Putin that Ukraine would not consider territorial concessions.
It later became known that US President Donald Trump plans to hold a trilateral meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin on August 22. The American president informed Ukrainian and European leaders of this during a joint telephone conversation. At the same time, Putin has not yet publicly agreed to attend the meeting with Zelenskyy.
Also, follow “Pryamyi” on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, and Instagram.
• Materials published in the “OPINIONS” section reflect the opinion of the author of the publication, who bears full responsibility for the accuracy of the information.
• The editorial staff of prm.ua may not share the opinions expressed in the author’s material.
• The owner of the webpage in the “OPINIONS” section is the author of the publication.