Needles in Sacks and Minds in Chaos: What ‘Minditchgate’ Reveals About Society”
фотоколаж: facebook В.Смірнов
Source: Author’s Facebook page
No matter how much theatre is staged around “rallying behind Zelenskyy and his team,” the public will gradually uncover the truth.
According to a survey by the Sociopolis Center:
-
90% are aware of the NABU/SAP investigation into Mindich, his accomplices, and his patrons.
-
76.6% consider the findings justified — roughly corresponding to over 70% of respondents who believe that the scale of government corruption increased during the full-scale invasion.
-
38.2% hold Zelenskyy (19.2%) and his office (18.8%) responsible. Even the deputies, whom opposition Telegram channels like to blame, are held less accountable.
This data should serve as a wake-up call for the Office of the President. Attempts to “sweep the scandal under the rug” have failed spectacularly.
There is no need to puff up your cheeks and assume the position of “those who do not rally behind Zelenskyy are rallying behind Putin.” This is deception and manipulation, typical of populists. It is known as presenting a false choice. I have written extensively on this.
In reality, the choice is to unite around Ukraine — to improve the quality of governance radically:
-
The government, Yermak/OP, and other figures involved in the NABU/SAP cases must resign.
-
The formal “monomajority” in the Verkhovna Rada should be dissolved, and a coalition of national unity formed, similar to the European alliance established in 2014.
-
A Government of National Salvation should be established, based on this coalition and independent of directives from the Office of the President, regardless of who may influence Zelenskyy.
Every lost day prolongs the rule of ineffective, corrupt “managers” and “robbers,” exacting a heavy toll on Ukraine.
Also, follow “Pryamyi” on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, and Instagram.
• Materials published in the “OPINIONS” section reflect the opinion of the author of the publication, who bears full responsibility for the accuracy of the information.
• The editorial staff of prm.ua may not share the opinions expressed in the author’s material.
• The owner of the webpage in the “OPINIONS” section is the author of the publication.