Geneva’s Dirty Deal: How Trump and Putin Are Tightening the ‘Peace’ Noose Around Ukraine

Source: Author’s Facebook page
Moscow, remaining true to its terrorist tactics, welcomed the start of the negotiations with a massive strike on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure. Hundreds of drones and dozens of missiles became the Kremlin’s real non-paper—not a diplomatic document, but an ultimatum written in the wreckage of transformers and the cold of darkened homes.

These are not “parallel tracks” or “non-adjacent processes.” This is one single strategy: to break our spines with frost, so that in Geneva we sign the surrender with trembling hands – not from the weight of history, but from the temperature in our own apartments.

We need to look soberly: what is happening now is not a search for peace. This is a bargain for our sovereignty, where Ukraine is trying to remain a subject, but it is stubbornly being dragged into the role of a commodity. Trump wants to quickly “sell” this to his electorate as a “successful case”: he stopped the war, checked the box, and moved on. Putin wants to sell it to his own, as the legalization of a savage occupation: they say, the world has recognized that it is possible to kill, rob, and seize territories for it. And the real price of this “peace” is our land, our army, our memory, our children, our dead, and our right to call a crime a crime.

Who is in the room?

There are three people in the room. But two people have weight in the room.

1) USA (Witkoff and Kushner).
Trump sent his “decision makers” – not diplomats. These are people for whom Ukraine is not a story of freedom but a case of risk management: how to “close” a war at minimal cost. Their religion is a deadline. Their goal is “quickly”. Because “quickly” is more important to Trump than “fairly”, and justice is always long, expensive, and inconvenient. And most importantly, “quickly” means the bill will be given to the weaker, hurting one. This is basic business logic when a humanitarian tragedy is translated into KPIs.

2) Russia (Medinsky and security forces).
They did not come for a truce. They came for the rest of Donetsk Oblast and a seal that would legalize looting. They do not need silence in the sky – they need a piece of paper that would turn crime into the norm. All their “peace” formulas are tools for legalizing occupation, institutionalizing violence, and whitewashing aggression retrospectively. Their ideal “peace” is a pause in which Ukraine demilitarizes and Russia rearms.

3) Ukraine (Umerov delegation).
The Ukrainian delegation is caught between the hammer of Russian missiles and the anvil of American pressure “for results.” These are negotiations with a gun to their head, where “de-escalation” means “give up a part of yourself so we can take the gun off for an hour.” But the main problem is not who is sitting in the room. The main problem is what is on the table, and what traps are sewn into the papers.

What’s on the table?

They are trying to foist the so-called 28-point “US-backed” plan on us. Let’s call a spade a spade: this is a document dictated by a Russian non-paper, only printed on an American printer. This is an attempt to ensure that Moscow gets a strategic, Washington gets a media, and Ukraine gets an “explanation why it can’t be done any other way.”

The key elements of this “plan” are such that they are in themselves signals of surrender:

“Quick elections” (in 100 days) – in a country where millions of people are under occupation, millions abroad, tens of thousands in the army, and the information space is being shot through by IPSO like a sieve. This is not a democracy. This is a technological way to destabilize the state, disrupt mobilization, sow internal hatred, and open the gates of revenge under the guise of “renewing legitimacy”. Elections held under shelling and under the pressure of an ‘agreement’ are not a choice; they are a form of controlled instability.

“Amnesty for all” – that is, for both the executioners and the victims. This is not reconciliation; it is the liquidation of justice. This is spitting on the graves of the tortured, the wounded, the raped, the deported. Amnesty in this war is not a legal instrument, but a tool for erasing memory. It kills the very concept of a crime: if there is “no crime”, then there is no aggressor, there is a “conflict of parties”. This is Moscow’s main goal.

The “Peace Council” under Trump’s chairmanship is the height of absurdity: the creation of a supranational superstructure that will decide what Ukraine can and cannot do. These are not guarantees. These are guardianship. This is a new format of vassal dependence, where Ukraine receives not protection, but a supervisor. We already underwent “supervision” in the 1990s – only then it was called “stabilization.”

The trap here is simple: legalization of the occupation through formal structures. Not outright recognition of annexation – but the creation of “gray zones” and “transitional statuses”, where on paper it seems to be Ukraine, but in fact, a criminalized territory under the FSB. This can be formalized as a “free economic zone”, “special regime”, “temporary administration”, “international mission” – the name is not important. One thing is important: there will be no Ukrainian sovereignty as a reality. There will be a “bargaining territory”, where law is replaced by “order”, and order by force.

Europe: E3 is trying, but Trump is playing solo poker

Britain, France, and Germany are trying to put in their two cents — speaking of ‘sanctions conditionality,’ ‘guarantees,’ and ‘verification mechanisms.’ But when Trump sits at the table, Europe fades into the background: he does not play as part of a coalition; he plays the way he is used to — with his own cards. And if his goal is to ‘close the deal,’ then European reservations will amount to little more than background noise. In this arrangement, Europe risks becoming the arena where the pressure is applied, yet it does not hold the keys to the door.

Ukrainian framework: 20 points against 28 traps
Ukraine has put forward a 20-point framework. It includes remote monitoring of the line of contact (satellite surveillance and technical verification) and, most importantly, watertight security guarantees for more than 20 years. This is the right approach, because wars do not end with words — they end when the aggressor fears repeating them.

Trump is offering 15 years. Why 15? Because he knows perfectly well: in 15 years, this will no longer be his administration’s problem. Short guarantees are a direct invitation to Putin for revenge. This is not a “compromise”. This is a timer for a new war. These are guarantees not of Ukraine’s security, but of the comfort of American policy: “there will be no problems on my horizon.”

Energy “truce”: naivety bordering on crime

In Kyiv, they hope to negotiate an “energy truce.” But after yesterday’s arrivals, believing in the promises of the Russian Federation without automatic sanctions is not just naivety. It is managerial irresponsibility. The UN directly records: strikes on the energy sector deprive people of water and heat in the fierce winter. And this is not “collateral damage.” This is the goal. This is social blackmail with the cold, which should generate political pressure to “agree to anything.”

If we sign an “energy silence” without strict verification and an automatic price for violation, Putin will do exactly what he has always done: regroup, stockpile missiles, rebuild logistics, and strike again the second he wants to bargain for the next “little thing.” A truce without coercion is not peace; it is a pause for the aggressor.

And it’s also a psychological trap. Because when society is sold “silence” as a product once, tomorrow they will sell it “silence in the cities,” then “silence on the front,” then “silence by law.” This is a mechanism for normalizing violence: at first, you’re glad that you’re not being beaten all day, then you start thinking that you’re being beaten “for something.”

Three tests for any signature

Any signature under the Geneva document must pass three tests. No exceptions.

1) Legal position
No international recognition of the annexation. No formulas that turn the occupation into a “transitional status”. UN Resolution ES-11/4 is our legal concrete. Any “free zone” without the flag of Ukraine is a betrayal that will cost the next generation dearly. Any “conditional neutrality” is not neutrality; it is the disarmament of the victim before the aggressor.

2) Coercion mechanism
Not a “Peace Council” with beautiful words. But an automatic snap-back of sanctions, without discussions, without “concerns”, without votes “later”. Plus air defense/missile defense as part of the mechanism: in the first second of a violation, there should not be a diplomatic call, but a shooting down of what is flying. Coercion is not morality. This is deterrence engineering.
And another thing: monitoring without coercion is a surveillance camera in the entrance, where everyone knows it is not connected.

3) People
The return of deported children and hostages is item #1, not a bonus after the “territorial settlement.” The ICC already has warrants. Amnesty for war crimes is not peace. It is an indulgence for torturers and spitting on the graves of the tortured. No self-respecting country signs a document that removes responsibility for torture as a “political compromise.”

How not to let yourself be abandoned

Ukraine must clearly tell the US: “Fast does not mean good.” If you want a deadline, then the price of that deadline should be legally binding security guarantees, not another “Budapest Memorandum 2.0” that turns into waste paper at the moment of the first strike.

Guarantees “after the deal” are not guarantees. This is insurance bargaining. This is an attempt to force Ukraine to make irreversible concessions “on credit” that no one guarantees will be returned.

Because peace is not a cessation of fire. Any durable peace demands neutralizing the aggressor’s capacity for further violence, or at least their capacity for violence. Anything else is merely a postponed war.

Plan B: If Geneva turns into “Munich 1938.”

If the talks in Geneva turn into “Munich 1938”, Ukraine must do three things – without hysteria, but firmly:

Deaf defense of the energy sector: engineering protection, reserves, autonomy, rapid recovery, systemic air defense.

The pressure of sanctions (the conditional 20th EU package and beyond) – without “fatigue”, without “exceptions”, without private schemes to “come to an understanding with Moscow”.

Hold the front line: better a cold winter and struggle than a “warm peace” in a Russian concentration camp.

Conclusion

Geneva is not about the end of the war. Geneva is about whether Trump and Putin will be able to legalize aggression with our blood and our signature. Ukraine does not trade territories. Ukraine can discuss the mechanics of a ceasefire — but only one in which any violation would cost the aggressor more than compliance.

Anything else is not peace. It is beautifully packaged. It is a delayed death.

Also, follow “Pryamyi” on Facebook, X, Telegram, and Instagram.

• Materials published in the “OPINIONS” section reflect the opinion of the author of the publication, who bears full responsibility for the accuracy of the information.
• The editorial staff of prm.ua may not share the opinions expressed in the author’s material.
• The owner of the webpage in the “OPINIONS” section is the author of the publication.